Seonix

Seonix analyzes a business website, researches the queries customers use, writes SEO articles in the brand's voice and publishes them automatically, with modules for Google ranking and visibility in ChatGPT and Gemini answers.

Seonix is an SEO automation platform that handles the full loop from site analysis to published articles. A user pastes a website link, and the system studies the business, works out which queries its customers type, writes articles for those queries, and posts them to the blog on a schedule. The pitch is aimed at companies that want steady organic traffic without paying for an agency retainer or hiring an in-house writer. What sets it apart from a plain article generator is the emphasis on AI search. Alongside classic work such as technical audits, keyword research, meta tags, schema markup and Search Console and GA4 reporting, Seonix tracks whether ChatGPT and Gemini mention a brand, structures articles with direct answers and FAQ blocks so engines can quote them, and maintains an llms.txt map of key pages. The homepage groups this into 14 modules, eight for traditional SEO and six for AI search, and says they run automatically on every project without manual setup. In practice the workflow has three steps: connect a site, let the AI generate articles, images and a content plan, then review results. Content is written in the brand's own voice and can be edited before or after publishing, with no SEO expertise required. Output covers more than 50 languages, which suits businesses serving several markets. Each article is scored against on-page checks and refined until it passes, and older articles that lose positions can be rewritten. The homepage backs its claims with live examples of client sites ranking in Google, plus its own blog, which it says is produced by the product itself. Pricing is positioned against agency retainers, with a paid plan starting at $49 per month after a short $1 trial. Seonix fits small businesses, marketers and site owners who prefer hands-off publishing. Teams that want deep manual control over every editorial decision, or a standalone enterprise rank-tracking suite, may find the autopilot approach less suitable, and results will depend on niche competition and site quality.