Skillaeo

Skillaeo is an AI search tool. An audit tool for AI search visibility. It asks GPT a small set of questions about your domain, then reports brand mentions, citations, factual accuracy, competitor appearances, and site readiness signals, with the underlying questions and answers shown so findings can be verified.

Skillaeo is an audit tool built around AI Engine Optimization, the practice of reviewing how public information about a site is found, summarized, or cited in AI-assisted search. It runs a fixed set of industry-relevant questions through an AI engine and reports back on what came out: whether each answer names the brand or links to the domain, whether the descriptions match what the site actually publishes, which competitors appear in the same answers, and which public page and technical signals look weak. The anonymous audit is deliberately narrow. It asks five questions with one engine, GPT, and is capped at three audits per day with one per domain, subject to daily capacity. A separate signed-in Free plan is broader on paper: three full reports per month, still one engine, eight questions per report, and seven day report history. Larger engine and question allowances sit behind paid plans, though the homepage does not publish those tiers. Reports show the sampled questions, the answers, and the cited URLs, so findings can be checked against sources rather than taken on trust. The tool suits marketing leads, SEO practitioners, and SaaS or agency teams who suspect competitors are surfacing in AI answers and want evidence before rebuilding pages. Typical fixes it points toward are clearer FAQ content, Schema.org markup that matches visible copy, accurate public facts, and wider topic coverage. It also offers optional files for organizing site information, llms.txt and its own experimental agent.json format, while stating plainly that neither guarantees a citation. That honesty is the product's defining trait and its main constraint. Skillaeo frames each result as one documented snapshot rather than a forecast, which makes it a reasonable first check but not a monitoring platform. Teams that need continuous tracking across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity will outgrow the anonymous tier quickly. Read the sample report and the scoring methodology first; both are published, and both show how much weight a five-question sample can carry.