BRYTER Extract

BRYTER Extract is an AI tool. BEAMON Extract applies a fixed set of legal questions across many contracts at once and fills a spreadsheet style review table, with every answer linked back to the passage that supports it.

BEAMON Extract is a legal review tool built for a specific, repetitive problem: answering the same questions across dozens or hundreds of documents that differ only in detail. Instead of opening each lease, NDA or supplier agreement and hunting for clauses by hand, a lawyer defines a set of questions once and applies them to an entire document collection. The output lands in a review table that behaves like a spreadsheet, with one row per document and one column per question. Cell values are populated automatically after the system reads every file. Question formats are deliberately narrow rather than open ended. Reviewers can request yes/no answers, dates, numbers, clauses or short descriptions, which keeps output consistent enough to sort, filter and compare. The grid is not fixed: new questions, changed answer formats and additional documents can be added at any point, and the table recalculates as the scope shifts. This matters for matters that evolve, where the client's priorities or the regulator's expectations move mid review. Verification is the centre of the design. Every extracted answer carries a reference back to the exact passage in the source document. A reviewer clicks a cell, reads the underlying text and jumps to the location, then overrides the answer if the model read it wrong. The marketing is explicit that the lawyer carries responsibility for whatever is finally used, which positions the product as assistance rather than autonomous review. Results can be exported for reporting, collaboration or downstream automation, and the wider BEAMON platform adds workflows, a Microsoft Word side panel and knowledge connections to repositories such as iManage and SharePoint. The fit is legal teams with volume: in house counsel handling contract backlogs, law firms running due diligence or lease portfolios, and compliance groups checking the same obligations across a set of filings. Anyone reviewing two or three documents manually gains little. The value appears at scale, and the tool is best judged against contract review features in general purpose assistants, which typically process documents one at a time.