March Health

Multi-agent clinical AI that builds patient digital twins inside the EHR

Advanced
March Health

What is March Health?

March Health is a hospital-facing clinical AI platform that builds patient digital twins from EHR, lab and imaging data, then runs specialized agents for infection, readmission and safety risk with next-best-action guidance delivered inside the clinician workflow.

March Health is a clinical AI platform built around a patient-level digital twin: a continuously updated model of an individual patient assembled from medical history, labs, imaging and real-time data. Specialized AI agents sit on top of that twin, each watching a different risk surface such as infection, readmission or safety events, while other agents handle discharge planning and documentation. Recommendations surface as next-best-action guidance inside the EHR rather than in a separate dashboard, which keeps the clinician in the decision loop. The product is aimed at hospital leadership and care teams operating under value-based reimbursement. The homepage frames the problem in CMS terms: excess readmission ratios above 1.0 can cut Medicare payments, top-quartile hospital-acquired condition rates trigger a penalty, and a share of payments is withheld and redistributed by Total Performance Score. March Health positions its agents as a way to move those quality and cost metrics, claiming up to a 15% reduction in 30-day readmissions and an 8 to 12% drop in unnecessary tests and procedures, alongside 30 to 45 minutes of clinician time saved per shift. In practice, deployment starts with an EHR connection over FHIR and HL7, covering Epic, Cerner and other systems. The twin is then built per patient and the agent set tuned to the hospital's priorities. The vendor states a go-live window of under 90 days with measurable ROI in 6 to 12 months, and describes outcomes being fed back into the model so recommendations track current evidence. Training data is drawn from more than 3 million de-identified patient records and 50 billion clinical data points spanning MRI, CT, lab tests and clinical notes. Among clinical AI vendors, March Health competes less with note-taking scribes and more with population health and sepsis surveillance suites, differentiating on the digital twin abstraction and an orchestrated multi-agent design. It reports development with Mayo Clinic curation and alignment with FDA clinical decision support guidelines, plus HIPAA, GDPR readiness and SOC 2 Type II. Pricing is not published and is handled through a demo request.

How do you use March Health?

  1. 1Request a demo through the site form
    Submit name, work email and organization name. The page notes the details are used only to schedule and tailor the demo.
  2. 2Walk through your CMS metrics
    The demo includes a personalized review of ERR, SIR, MSPB and HCAHPS figures, which establishes the baseline the agents are meant to improve.
  3. 3Review the ROI model and governance plan
    The same session covers an ROI calculator walkthrough and an implementation and governance plan, so finance and clinical leadership can size the commitment.
  4. 4Connect the EHR over FHIR and HL7
    Once contracted, integration work links Epic, Cerner or another EHR using FHIR and HL7 standards, with the stated goal of leaving existing workflows intact.
  5. 5Build patient twins and activate agents
    Patient-level twins are assembled from history, labs, imaging and live data, and the relevant agents for infection, readmission, safety or discharge are switched on.
  6. 6Use next-best-action guidance in the EHR
    Clinicians receive recommendations inside their existing system, and outcomes are fed back to refine the model against hospital quality metrics.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Recommendations are delivered inside the EHR, so guidance lands where clinicians already workAI
  • Clear tie between the product and CMS quality and penalty metrics that hospital finance teams trackAI
  • Covers several risk surfaces (readmission, infection, safety, discharge) through one orchestrated agent setAI
  • Publishes specific outcome targets for readmissions, waste and clinician time rather than vague efficiency claimsAI
  • EHR connectivity described as FHIR and HL7 based, with Epic and Cerner namedAI

Cons

  • No public pricing, no free tier and no self-serve path; every evaluation starts with a sales demoAI
  • Outcome figures are vendor-stated targets and no independent validation or customer results are shown on the homepageAI
  • Product direction is hospital and value-based care specific, so small practices and individual clinicians have no fitAI
  • Ties to Epic and Cerner workflows mean the value depends heavily on each hospital's data quality and integration depthAI
  • Requires months of deployment and governance work before ROI, which is a heavy commitment for smaller systemsAI

How much does March Health cost?

Integrations

Connects to Epic, Cerner and other EHR systems using FHIR and HL7 standards.

Features

Patient-level digital twins built from medical history, labs, imaging and real-time data; orchestrated agents for infection risk, readmission risk, safety events, discharge planning and documentation; next-best-action guidance inside the EHR; digital coaching and ambient AI for patient engagement; continuous learning from outcomes; models trained on 3 million de-identified records and 50 billion clinical data points.

Frequently asked questions about March Health

  • How do you use March Health?
    The walkthrough on this page covers 6 steps: 1. Request a demo through the site form 2. Walk through your CMS metrics 3. Review the ROI model and governance plan 4. Connect the EHR over FHIR and HL7 5. Build patient twins and activate agents 6. Use next-best-action guidance in the EHR.
  • What platforms does March Health support?
    March Health is available on Web App.
  • What does March Health integrate with?
    Connects to Epic, Cerner and other EHR systems using FHIR and HL7 standards.
  • What are the limitations of March Health?
    No public pricing, no free tier and no self-serve path; every evaluation starts with a sales demo. Outcome figures are vendor-stated targets and no independent validation or customer results are shown on the homepage. Product direction is hospital and value-based care specific, so small practices and individual clinicians have no fit.

Status

StatusActive
Views0
Outbound clicks0
Added10/21/2026

Platforms

Web App

Pricing

Paid